A One-Vote Oddity
Freeman Clark, Daniel Kelso and
(see the back story in Day 7 and 8 posts)
Wooed by both France and Britain to remain an independent Republic and tossed by the political winds of the brewing battle over slavery, Texas was not easily brought into the Union.18 The election of 1844, brought James Polk into the Presidency in a landslide. Polk had run on a campaign to bring
This procedure had two benefits. One, it was much faster than a treaty and two, it could be done by a simple majority in both houses rather than a two-thirds majority required for a treaty. The Texans loved the new proposal and procedures started.
The measure sailed through the House of Representatives (132-75) but support wavered in the Senate. Finally, a vote was taken.
How do Freeman Clark, and Daniel Kelso and Edward A. Hannigan play into the story? Freeman Clark was the vote that put Daniel Kelso in the Indiana Senate. It was Daniel Kelso’s vote that put Edward Hannigan in the U.S. Senate, and it was Hannigan, the pro-annexation of Texas Senator from
Maybe your vote will be the difference in an election this year.
FootNotes:
16. Harris, R. Laird; Harris, Robert Laird; Archer, Gleason Leonard; Waltke, Bruce K.: Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. electronic ed.
17. BreakPoint with Charles Colson, “The Crime of Conviction: The Crime of Morality,” March 15, 2007.
18. For a fascinating and an entertaining history on
No comments:
Post a Comment